ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Online Tests & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Tests

P.S. Kostenlose 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von EchteFrage verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AmyF26c60XHK6LS6HTyNrzeZwvSFEdrU

Wissen Sie PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps von EchteFrage? Warum sind diese Dumps von den Benutzern gut bewertet? Wollen Sie diese Dumps probieren? Klicken Sie bitte EchteFrage Website und die Demo herunterladen. Und jedr Fragenkatalog hat eine kostlose Demo. Wenn Sie es gut finden, können Sie diese Dumps sofort kaufen. Nach dem Kauf können Sie auch einen einjährigen kostlosen Aktualisierungsservice bekommen. Innerhalb eines Jahres können Sie die neuesten PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsunterlagen besitzen. Damit können Sie PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung sehr leicht bestehen und dieses Zertifikat bekommen.

Um die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-Zertifizierung zu erlangen, müssen Kandidaten ihr Verständnis für den ISO/IEC 27001-Standard und dessen Anforderungen sowie ihre Fähigkeit, eine ISMS-Prüfung zu planen, durchzuführen, zu berichten und nachzubereiten, demonstrieren. Die Prüfung umfasst eine Reihe von Themen, einschließlich Prinzipien des Informations-Sicherheits-Managements, Risikobewertung und -management, Prüfungsplanung und -vorbereitung sowie Prüftechniken und -tools. Sie bewertet auch das Wissen der Kandidaten über den Prüfungsprozess, einschließlich der Kommunikation mit Prüfungskunden, der Bewertung von Prüfungsergebnissen und der Vorbereitung von Prüfungsberichten.

Die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-Prüfung richtet sich an Fachleute, die zertifizierte Lead-Auditoren für den ISO/IEC-27001-Standard werden möchten. Diese Zertifizierung ist international anerkannt und zeigt, dass eine Person über das erforderliche Wissen und die erforderlichen Fähigkeiten verfügt, um eine effektive Prüfung des Informationssicherheitsmanagementsystems (ISMS) einer Organisation durchzuführen. Die Prüfung umfasst eine Vielzahl von Themen, einschließlich der Grundsätze und Konzepte des Informationssicherheitsmanagements, der Risikobewertung, der Prüfungsplanung und -vorbereitung, der Durchführung einer Prüfung sowie der Berichterstattung und Nachverfolgung.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Online Tests <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Tests & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Echte Fragen

Alle Menschen haben ihre eigenes Ziel, aber wir haben ein gleiches Ziel, dass Sie PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung bestehen. Dieses Ziel zu erreichen ist vielleicht nur ein kleiner Schritt für Ihre Entwicklung im IT-Gebiet. Aber es ist der ganze Wert unserer PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungssoftware. Wir tun alles wir können, um die Prüfungsaufgaben zu erweitern. Und die Prüfungsunterlagen werden von unsere IT-Profis analysiert. Dadurch können Sie unbelastet und effizient benutzen. Um zu garantieren, dass die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Unterlagen, die Sie benutzen, am neuesten ist, bieten wir einjährige kostenlose Aktualisierung.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q171-Q176):

171. Frage
Scenario 4: Branding is a marketing company that works with some of the most famous companies in the US. To reduce internal costs. Branding has outsourced the software development and IT helpdesk operations to Techvology for over two years. Techvology. equipped with the necessary expertise, manages Branding's software, network, and hardware needs. Branding has implemented an information security management system (ISMS) and is certified against ISO/IEC 27001, demonstrating its commitment to maintaining high standards of information security. It actively conducts audits on Techvology to ensure that the security of its outsourced operations complies with ISO/IEC 27001 certification requirements.
During the last audit. Branding's audit team defined the processes to be audited and the audit schedule. They adopted an evidence based approach, particularly in light of two information security incidents reported by Techvology in the past year The focus was on evaluating how these incidents were addressed and ensuring compliance with the terms of the outsourcing agreement The audit began with a comprehensive review of Techvology's methods for monitoring the quality of outsourced operations, assessing whether the services provided met Branding's expectations and agreed-upon standards The auditors also verified whether Techvology complied with the contractual requirements established between the two entities This involved thoroughly examining the terms and conditions in the outsourcing agreement to guarantee that all aspects, including information security measures, are being adhered to.
Furthermore, the audit included a critical evaluation of the governance processes Techvology uses to manage its outsourced operations and other organizations. This step is crucial for Branding to verify that proper controls and oversight mechanisms are in place to mitigate potential risks associated with the outsourcing arrangement.
The auditors conducted interviews with various levels of Techvology's personnel and analyzed the incident resolution records. In addition, Techvology provided the records that served as evidence that they conducted awareness sessions for the staff regarding incident management. Based on the information gathered, they predicted that both information security incidents were caused by incompetent personnel. Therefore, auditors requested to see the personnel files of the employees involved in the incidents to review evidence of their competence, such as relevant experience, certificates, and records of attended trainings.
Branding's auditors performed a critical evaluation of the validity of the evidence obtained and remained alert for evidence that could contradict or question the reliability of the documented information received. During the audit at Techvology, the auditors upheld this approach by critically assessing the incident resolution records and conducting thorough interviews with employees at different levels and functions. They did not merely take the word of Techvology's representatives for facts; instead, they sought concrete evidence to support the representatives' claims about the incident management processes.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to Scenario 4, what type of audit evidence did the auditors collect to determine the source of the information security incidents?

A. Verbal and documentary evidence
B. Confirmative and technical evidence
C. Analytical and mathematical evidence

Antwort: A

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct answer:
Auditors conducted interviews (verbal evidence) and analyzed incident resolution records, employee training logs, and governance policies (documentary evidence).
ISO 19011:2018 (Clause 6.4.7) states that audit evidence can be verbal, documented, observed, or analytical.
B . Incorrect:
Confirmative evidence involves third-party validation, which was not explicitly mentioned.
C . Incorrect:
Mathematical analysis was not conducted in this audit.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.7 (Audit Evidence Collection Methods)

172. Frage
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader. You are currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an international haulage organisation. You have sampled four internal audit reports which state:
Report 1 - Auditor: Mr James.
Over the year the organisation has failed to meet its promised delivery dates on 23 occasions out of 100. This is against a target of '95% of deliveries on time'.
Grading - Minor
Corrective Action due: Within 9 months.
Report 2 - Auditor: Mr James.
Between January and March, it was noted 125 complaints were received about the Service Desk Team. Clients accused them of being rude and unresponsive.
Grading - Minor
Corrective Action due: Within 12 months.
Report 3 - Auditor: Mr James.
Of the 40 customer orders received last month, 38 were correctly processed. Of the remaining 2, one was missing a signature and one was missing a date.
Grading -
Corrections due: Within 3 weeks
Report 4 - Auditor: Mr Rogers.
Of the 30 personnel records examined, 26 were found to be fully completed whilst the remaining 4 were all missing the individual's start date.
Grading - Major
Corrections due: Within 1 week
Which four of the options demonstrate the concerns you would have about these reports?

A. I would be concerned as to whether criteria for grading nonconformities are in existence in this organisation
B. I would be concerned that no grading is recorded for Report 3. This could indicate that the auditor did not complete the report correctly or that they failed to make a determination as to severity
C. I would be concerned that the auditors focussed only on information security processes
D. I would be concerned as to whether the auditors understand the difference between corrections and corrective actions
E. I would have a concern that one auditor appeared to be conducting most of the internal audits
F. I would be concerned because action taken to address a major nonconformity should always be completed sooner than action taken to address minor nonconformities
G. I would be concerned that timing for addressing the nonconformities is significantly different in the four reports
H. I would have a concern that no nonconformity review was conducted

Antwort: A,B,D,G

173. Frage
There is a scheduled fire drill in your facility. What should you do?

A. Participate in the drill
B. Excuse yourself by saying you have an urgent deliverable
C. None of the above
D. Call in sick

Antwort: A

Begründung:
You should participate in the drill, because this is part of the organization's business continuity plan and emergency response procedures. The drill is intended to test the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization's preparedness for fire incidents, and to ensure the safety and security of the personnel and assets. By participating in the drill, you are demonstrating your compliance with the organization's information security policy and culture, as well as your awareness of the potential risks and impacts of fire incidents. The drill is also an opportunity for you to learn and improve your skills and knowledge on how to respond to fire emergencies. Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Why fire drills are important

174. Frage
You are performing an ISMS audit at a European-based residential
nursing home called ABC that provides healthcare services. You find all nursing home residents wear an electronic wristband for monitoring their location, heartbeat, and blood pressure always. You learned that the electronic wristband automatically uploads all data to the artificial intelligence (AI) cloud server for healthcare monitoring and analysis by healthcare staff.
The next step in your audit plan is to verify that the information security policy and objectives have been established by top management.
During the audit, you found the following audit evidence.
Match the audit evidence to the corresponding requirement in ISO/IEC 27001:2022.

Antwort:

Begründung:

175. Frage
Scenario 6: Cyber ACrypt is a cybersecurity company that provides endpoint protection by offering anti-malware and device security, asset life cycle management, and device encryption. To validate its ISMS against ISO/IEC 27001 and demonstrate its commitment to cybersecurity excellence, the company underwent a meticulous audit process led by John, the appointed audit team leader.
Upon accepting the audit mandate, John promptly organized a meeting to outline the audit plan and team roles This phase was crucial for aligning the team with the audit's objectives and scope However, the initial presentation to Cyber ACrypt's staff revealed a significant gap in understanding the audit's scope and objectives, indicating potential readiness challenges within the company As the stage 1 audit commenced, the team prepared for on-site activities. They reviewed Cyber ACrypt's documented information, including the information security policy and operational procedures ensuring each piece conformed to and was standardized in format with author identification, production date, version number, and approval date Additionally, the audit team ensured that each document contained the information required by the respective clause of the standard This phase revealed that a detailed audit of the documentation describing task execution was unnecessary, streamlining the process and focusing the team's efforts on critical areas During the phase of conducting on-site activities, the team evaluated management responsibility for the Cyber Acrypt's policies This thorough examination aimed to ascertain continual improvement and adherence to ISMS requirements Subsequently, in the document, the stage 1 audit outputs phase, the audit team meticulously documented their findings, underscoring their conclusions regarding the fulfillment of the stage 1 objectives. This documentation was vital for the audit team and Cyber ACrypt to understand the preliminary audit outcomes and areas requiring attention.
The audit team also decided to conduct interviews with key interested parties. This decision was motivated by the objective of collecting robust audit evidence to validate the management system's compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements. Engaging with interested parties across various levels of Cyber ACrypt provided the audit team with invaluable perspectives and an understanding of the ISMS's implementation and effectiveness.
The stage 1 audit report unveiled critical areas of concern. The Statement of Applicability (SoA) and the ISMS policy were found to be lacking in several respects, including insufficient risk assessment, inadequate access controls, and lack of regular policy reviews. This prompted Cyber ACrypt to take immediate action to address these shortcomings. Their prompt response and modifications to the strategic documents reflected a strong commitment to achieving compliance.
The technical expertise introduced to bridge the audit team's cybersecurity knowledge gap played a pivotal role in identifying shortcomings in the risk assessment methodology and reviewing network architecture. This included evaluating firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention systems, and other network security measures, as well as assessing how Cyber ACrypt detects, responds to, and recovers from external and internal threats. Under John's supervision, the technical expert communicated the audit findings to the representatives of Cyber ACrypt. However, the audit team observed that the expert s objectivity might have been compromised due to receiving consultancy fees from the auditee. Considering the behavior of the technical expert during the audit, the audit team leader decided to discuss this concern with the certification body.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to Scenario 6, Cyber ACrypt modified the SoA and the ISMS policy after the Stage 1 audit report. How do you define this situation?

A. Acceptable, minor modifications to the SoA and ISMS policy can be made until the submission of the final audit report
B. Acceptable, situations that lead to major nonconformities during the Stage 2 audit should be corrected
C. Unacceptable, once the external audit passes Stage 1, the SoA and the ISMS policy cannot be modified

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
B . Correct Answer:
Stage 1 audits identify gaps and allow the organization to correct major nonconformities before Stage 2 certification.
ISO/IEC 27006 requires organizations to address major nonconformities before proceeding to Stage 2.
A . Incorrect:
Organizations are allowed to correct nonconformities identified in Stage 1.
C . Incorrect:
Major changes must be addressed, not just minor modifications.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO/IEC 27006:2020 Clause 9.2.3 (Stage 1 and Stage 2 Audit Process)

176. Frage
......

Machen Sie sich noch Sorge darum, dass Sie keine enchten und zuversichtlichen Schulungsunterlagen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung finden können? Schulungsunterlagen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung aus EchteFrage sind von den erfahrenen IT-Experten zusammengechlossen, sie sind kombniert von Fragen und Antworten, daher sind sie nicht vergleichbar. Ihre Genauigkeit ist auch zweifellos. Wählen Sie EchteFrage, dann wählen Sie Erfolg.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Tests: https://www.echtefrage.top/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-deutsch-pruefungen.html

P.S. Kostenlose 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von EchteFrage verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AmyF26c60XHK6LS6HTyNrzeZwvSFEdrU